Unfortunately, adding it to the category doesn't sort the roads properly. I don't see the point of the category when this template links to the list of state roads.
- Categories are seperate from lists. Even if they may be redundant, they are needed for people that are navigating via the category namespace. --ChrisRuvolo 20:07, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Both categories that New Jersey state highways as a subcategory also have New Jersey State Highways. So someone navigating via categories would see it.--SPUI 02:10, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- It seems that the goal of having categories is to have every article in at least one category. This has already been hashed out in Wikipedia_talk:Categorization/Archive_1#Lists_v._categories. I say keep both. The more ways to group or access these pages, the better. --ChrisRuvolo 06:46, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
This is strange. Each page using the template has the category at the bottom, but the category only has this template. --SPUI 07:02, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Yes, I thought so too. I asked in #wikipedia and they suggested a database replication issue. There's some delay before they might show up. --ChrisRuvolo 08:10, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)